Xeradon Logo

Xeradon

Real Numbers From Real Workshops

When you're deciding where to invest your time and energy in learning predictive modeling, the numbers tell a clear story. These aren't hypothetical projections or marketing promises. They're actual results from participants who've worked through our hands-on financial forecasting workshops over the past years.

Workshop participant analyzing financial data models during live session
3,847
Active Learners This Year
126
Completed Workshops
18,500+
Hours of Practice Logged
92%
Workshop Completion Rate

Model Development Skills

87%

Participants who report significant improvement in building time series forecasts and regression models after completing the core workshop sequence.

Data Preparation Confidence

94%

Learners who feel comfortable cleaning financial datasets, handling missing values, and preparing data for predictive analysis without guidance.

Python Implementation

79%

Workshop graduates who successfully implement models in Python using pandas, scikit-learn, and statsmodels within three months of finishing.

Business Application

68%

Participants who've applied forecasting techniques to real business problems at work, from revenue prediction to risk assessment projects.

Trevor Lindskog workshop participant
Trevor Lindskog
Financial Analyst, Regional Bank

I spent three years doing basic Excel forecasts because that's what everyone at our bank knew how to do. After finishing the predictive modeling workshop, I built a customer churn model that actually worked. My manager asked me to train the rest of the analytics team on what I'd learned.

Trevor joined with basic spreadsheet skills and finished the advanced time series module in four months. He now leads monthly modeling reviews for his department and has helped implement automated forecasting for loan default prediction.

What Participants Actually Do With These Skills

Tracking how workshop graduates apply predictive modeling six months after completion

Revenue Forecasting

Building quarterly and annual revenue predictions using historical sales data and seasonal patterns.

42%

Risk Assessment

Creating models to evaluate credit risk, default probability, and portfolio risk exposure across financial products.

34%

Customer Behavior

Predicting customer churn, purchase likelihood, and lifetime value using behavioral data patterns.

28%
Adrienne Belmont workshop participant
Adrienne Belmont
Corporate Finance Manager

The workshop format made a huge difference. Instead of watching videos and hoping I understood, I worked through actual financial datasets from start to finish. When I hit problems with multicollinearity in my models, I had practical solutions from the exercises rather than just theory.

Adrienne completed the full workshop series while managing budget forecasting for a manufacturing company. She's since built automated reporting systems that reduced forecasting time by 60% and improved accuracy enough that leadership now uses her models for strategic planning decisions.

Learning Path Completion Rates

How participants progress through different workshop sequences

Foundation Track

Introduction to predictive concepts, basic statistical methods, and data preparation essentials.

96%

Applied Methods

Time series forecasting, regression techniques, and model validation using real financial scenarios.

81%

Advanced Techniques

Machine learning applications, ensemble methods, and production model deployment strategies.

63%
2,240
Models Built in Workshops
847
Peer Review Sessions
1,560
Dataset Challenges Completed
4.7/5
Average Workshop Rating
Participants collaborating on predictive model validation during workshop session

These Numbers Come From Practice

The completion rates and skill improvements you see here aren't based on passive video watching or reading documentation. Every number reflects participants who worked through datasets, built models, debugged errors, and refined their forecasts based on feedback.

Workshop sessions involve real financial data with actual business problems. You're not building toy models with clean data that magically works. You're dealing with missing values, outliers, seasonality issues, and all the messiness that comes with real-world forecasting. That's why the skills stick and why participants can actually apply what they've learned when they get back to their jobs.

Cookie Preferences

We use cookies to enhance your experience on our platform. You can choose which types of cookies to accept.